<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Tab Concepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/</link>
	<description>Just another mozillalabs.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Mardini</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Mardini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>I may have been wrong about that as I uninstalled the tool and the behavior continued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may have been wrong about that as I uninstalled the tool and the behavior continued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Mardini</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Mardini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>I am using  the add-on About:Tab 0.0.36, and I have to say I think the concept is there, but this version doesn&#039;t work well on a Mac (for me anyways).

I&#039;m the type to hit CMD-W to close tabs and ultimately the browser window.  With About:Tab 0.0.36 all tabs can close via CMD-W except the last one open.  I have to reach for the mouse to get that done.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using  the add-on About:Tab 0.0.36, and I have to say I think the concept is there, but this version doesn&#8217;t work well on a Mac (for me anyways).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the type to hit CMD-W to close tabs and ultimately the browser window.  With About:Tab 0.0.36 all tabs can close via CMD-W except the last one open.  I have to reach for the mouse to get that done.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oss 2009</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>oss 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>Thanks you. After trying the two, I must confess I prefer ambient news. I get more content and a better visual experience with it. Definitely a must-have extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you. After trying the two, I must confess I prefer ambient news. I get more content and a better visual experience with it. Definitely a must-have extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salihrocker</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3513</link>
		<dc:creator>salihrocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3513</guid>
		<description>Thanks you. I have no back and forward button on my home page could you help me set it up Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you. I have no back and forward button on my home page could you help me set it up Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salihrocker</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3512</link>
		<dc:creator>salihrocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3512</guid>
		<description>Thank you. I agree with Andres S. Lancheros, please take a look at Chrome’s new tab. It’s a very nice layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I agree with Andres S. Lancheros, please take a look at Chrome’s new tab. It’s a very nice layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3511</guid>
		<description>@saud,

I disagree, I use the URL bar a lot as do a lot of people I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@saud,</p>
<p>I disagree, I use the URL bar a lot as do a lot of people I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3510</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3510</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d personally rather have a function similar to Opera or Chrome&#039;s speed dial, that to me would be more useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d personally rather have a function similar to Opera or Chrome&#8217;s speed dial, that to me would be more useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudius Raphael Paeth, A3lyphe</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudius Raphael Paeth, A3lyphe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>Uh and by the way:

What you try to do is realizing a contextual widget system; Again: copy Opera.

And if you want the presentation that is best for it and what you obviously try to realize; copy vista sidebar.

And if you want a goddamn usable tab system; copy safari&#039;s (v4) extended version of the google chrome tab visualization.

And if you want the best way of representing bookmarks; copy windows 7 taskbar visualization, use it INSTEAD of the (in any application unnessecary) standard menu.

And if you got rid of the standard menu put it under your logo that in almost any system is representing your application in the upper left; so lean to old macOs as you did with some other features you already took over (what&#039;s in the upper right?).

Uh yeah, and if you&#039;re at it and got all that; copy Internet explorer 8 view of content exploration in the developers panel.

You know what?

You&#039;re browser is the only one beside Opera that is ABLE to do all that.

This would result in the best usability experience one using a browser could have.

Believe me, if you won&#039;t do it, others will.

And perhaps you are thinking about technology advantages?

What about a clean x64-version?

What about Direct-X and OpenGL? If you need help with that ask your concurrent developers at Microsoft and Opera.

Oh by the way: Did any of your developers ever looked at Opera 10 and how sites are rendered there?

Seems i&#039;m emotionally overloaded right now.

Hell yeah. But if you&#039;re following all that crap of business- and marketing-depending decisions made the last 20 years with open eyes, because you hope someone will do it right once; well, possibly you could understand.

However, at least i wish you will find a way to get rid of unwanted and indeed unneeded complexity.

Do your best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh and by the way:</p>
<p>What you try to do is realizing a contextual widget system; Again: copy Opera.</p>
<p>And if you want the presentation that is best for it and what you obviously try to realize; copy vista sidebar.</p>
<p>And if you want a goddamn usable tab system; copy safari&#8217;s (v4) extended version of the google chrome tab visualization.</p>
<p>And if you want the best way of representing bookmarks; copy windows 7 taskbar visualization, use it INSTEAD of the (in any application unnessecary) standard menu.</p>
<p>And if you got rid of the standard menu put it under your logo that in almost any system is representing your application in the upper left; so lean to old macOs as you did with some other features you already took over (what&#8217;s in the upper right?).</p>
<p>Uh yeah, and if you&#8217;re at it and got all that; copy Internet explorer 8 view of content exploration in the developers panel.</p>
<p>You know what?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re browser is the only one beside Opera that is ABLE to do all that.</p>
<p>This would result in the best usability experience one using a browser could have.</p>
<p>Believe me, if you won&#8217;t do it, others will.</p>
<p>And perhaps you are thinking about technology advantages?</p>
<p>What about a clean x64-version?</p>
<p>What about Direct-X and OpenGL? If you need help with that ask your concurrent developers at Microsoft and Opera.</p>
<p>Oh by the way: Did any of your developers ever looked at Opera 10 and how sites are rendered there?</p>
<p>Seems i&#8217;m emotionally overloaded right now.</p>
<p>Hell yeah. But if you&#8217;re following all that crap of business- and marketing-depending decisions made the last 20 years with open eyes, because you hope someone will do it right once; well, possibly you could understand.</p>
<p>However, at least i wish you will find a way to get rid of unwanted and indeed unneeded complexity.</p>
<p>Do your best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudius Raphael Paeth, A3lyphe</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudius Raphael Paeth, A3lyphe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t read all that, but what saud said 2 posts before, is what i&#039;m also concerned of:

combine the adress and search-bar finally;

and when we&#039;re at usability: How about copying opera in whole and get back to the roots by adding presentational features that windows 98 by channels already tried to emit into the market.
Oh yeah, sorry i forgot: Never argue on the enemies base, huh?

You know what, i was always in opposition to FireFox, which changed when the v3 beta was out. And then? You released it and bloated it up to a monster that needs more memory and processor usage than a fully driven vista with a heck of applications open.

This browser is just a set of crap in comparison to others, because what made it good is the concept behind, but that is in no way corresponding with how it shows up.

Get back to basics.
Be simple.
Be cool.

Split it into a professional version and a liteweight one.

There is a reason why GOOD software has almost 2 views&#124;editions you can use it.

You are way too fresh, to go further on that lifeline.

If you do, you&#039;ll die.

So don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t read all that, but what saud said 2 posts before, is what i&#8217;m also concerned of:</p>
<p>combine the adress and search-bar finally;</p>
<p>and when we&#8217;re at usability: How about copying opera in whole and get back to the roots by adding presentational features that windows 98 by channels already tried to emit into the market.<br />
Oh yeah, sorry i forgot: Never argue on the enemies base, huh?</p>
<p>You know what, i was always in opposition to FireFox, which changed when the v3 beta was out. And then? You released it and bloated it up to a monster that needs more memory and processor usage than a fully driven vista with a heck of applications open.</p>
<p>This browser is just a set of crap in comparison to others, because what made it good is the concept behind, but that is in no way corresponding with how it shows up.</p>
<p>Get back to basics.<br />
Be simple.<br />
Be cool.</p>
<p>Split it into a professional version and a liteweight one.</p>
<p>There is a reason why GOOD software has almost 2 views|editions you can use it.</p>
<p>You are way too fresh, to go further on that lifeline.</p>
<p>If you do, you&#8217;ll die.</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vero</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2008/08/new-tab-concepts/comment-page-2/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>Vero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/?p=255#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>Does anyone how to disable the new firefox feature of automatically copying the address of the current tab into the address bar of the new tab? For example, when I ctrl+t, the new tab automatically opens with the address of this tab.... I would like to disable that like in the older versions...
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone how to disable the new firefox feature of automatically copying the address of the current tab into the address bar of the new tab? For example, when I ctrl+t, the new tab automatically opens with the address of this tab&#8230;. I would like to disable that like in the older versions&#8230;<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

