<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing the Jetpack SDK: First Milestone Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/</link>
	<description>Experimental framework for lightweight Firefox extensions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:28:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shafa</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>shafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 04:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Can you still record audio from a browser using jetpack sdk? I hope there would be detailed examples to get started with. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you still record audio from a browser using jetpack sdk? I hope there would be detailed examples to get started with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatNateGuy</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatNateGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-140</guid>
		<description>What does this mean for XUL and related technologies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does this mean for XUL and related technologies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ritesh</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Hey, does this mean I wont be able to run Jetpack from the old tutorials? Great news about v 0.1. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, does this mean I wont be able to run Jetpack from the old tutorials? Great news about v 0.1. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Boo! Please make use of open video. It&#039;s easy to do. Here&#039;s how:

https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Using_audio_and_video_in_Firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo! Please make use of open video. It&#8217;s easy to do. Here&#8217;s how:</p>
<p><a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Using_audio_and_video_in_Firefox" rel="nofollow">https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Using_audio_and_video_in_Firefox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Kristensen</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Kristensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Installing SDKs, installing python, compiling, command line tools... Wow that looks extremely difficult to make one of these new JetPacks compared to good old extensions. Wasn&#039;t it supposed to make it easier? Using my favorite text editor and pressing refresh in the browser (or restarting it in the case of extensions) has worked for so long. Why make it so much more complicated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installing SDKs, installing python, compiling, command line tools&#8230; Wow that looks extremely difficult to make one of these new JetPacks compared to good old extensions. Wasn&#8217;t it supposed to make it easier? Using my favorite text editor and pressing refresh in the browser (or restarting it in the case of extensions) has worked for so long. Why make it so much more complicated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerv</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Your link to &quot;CommonJS&quot; is broken. Should it be http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/CommonJS ?

Gerv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link to &#8220;CommonJS&#8221; is broken. Should it be <a href="http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/CommonJS" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/CommonJS</a> ?</p>
<p>Gerv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Kowal</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Kowal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really excited that Jetpack will be able to leverage Narwhal&#039;s package ecosystem.  We&#039;re trying to cut the Narwhal standard library into a separate package so it could be installed without the bootstrapping and engine parts.  We&#039;re also going to migrate our toolchain onto exact CommonJS packages compliance soon. Thanks for the vote of confidence in Narhwal&#039;s architecture, and I look forward to my next opportunity to build a Jetpack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really excited that Jetpack will be able to leverage Narwhal&#8217;s package ecosystem.  We&#8217;re trying to cut the Narwhal standard library into a separate package so it could be installed without the bootstrapping and engine parts.  We&#8217;re also going to migrate our toolchain onto exact CommonJS packages compliance soon. Thanks for the vote of confidence in Narhwal&#8217;s architecture, and I look forward to my next opportunity to build a Jetpack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel Hecht</title>
		<link>http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/2010/03/09/announcing-the-jetpack-sdk/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel Hecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalabs.com/jetpack/?p=123#comment-103</guid>
		<description>A question on the security updates for APIs, wouldn&#039;t that bring us back into the scenario where we cannot test if a security fix broke the add-on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question on the security updates for APIs, wouldn&#8217;t that bring us back into the scenario where we cannot test if a security fix broke the add-on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

